The recent case of Dawson v. Dawson once again shed light on the importance of following procedure in the event of a member’s death. Similar to the decision in Ioppolo’s case, we saw that the trustee was able to demonstrate continued compliance with the definition of a SMSF within a six month time period without…
The recent case of Dawson v Dawson [2019] NSWSC 826 recently handed down by the New South Wales Supreme court serves as a solemn reminder of what can go wrong when families, particularly blended families, with SMSFs, are in conflict with incomplete documentation. In this blogpost, we explore the circumstances of the case and what…
It is one of the most contentious issues for members of a SMSF when it comes to the payment of a super income stream and their estate planning wishes – in the event of death, what document will take precedent? An auto-reversionary pension or binding death benefit nomination (BDBN)? Well, the answer ultimately depends upon…
The benefit of hindsight is a wonderful thing, in particular when it came to the way many practitioners dealt with the payment of income streams for their SMSF clients. Before 1 July 2017, where a member was 60 years or over, it really didn’t matter how the benefit payments were paid as the pension was…
